Is Israel An Apartheid State?

11 Mar

As I have mentioned on numerous occasions, I am against settlement expansions. I want to see an independent state of Palestine, next to the state of Israel, based on the Clinton Parameters.

This is one of the main reasons why I voted for Meretz in the recent elections.

In my opinion, unless we reach a peace deal with the Palestinians, Israel’s future could be endangered. I also believe in peace because I believe in human rights. I believe that the current regime of checkpoints, walls and tough security measures make the life of Palestinians in areas B and C miserable.

Such measures could be short term security solutions, but in the long run, they are more likely to create enemies for Israel and for peace. I don’t even want to imagine what it would be like to go through checkpoints everyday, manned by a foreign army asking me who I am, were I am going and coming from. Imagine going through such an experience everyday! How angry would you feel?

Add to that the security wall which in some cases has cut villages in half. The Oscar nominated documentary “5 broken cameras” (you can watch the entire movie here) vividly shows the hardships which many Palestinians go through because of the security barrier.

At the same time, I do not believe that Israel is an apartheid state.

If Israeli citizens were subjected to a different treatment as Palestinians in areas C and B of the West Bank are because of their nationality, then I would agree that Israel is an apartheid state.

If Arabs who are Israeli citizens were given discriminatory water allocations and different roads to travel on as Palestinians living in area C and B of West Bank have to, then I would say that Israel is an apartheid state.

But the fact remains that people who live the West Bank’s areas B and C are not citizens of Israel, therefore the different treatment which they are subjected to can’t be called apartheid.

And lets not forget that Israel’s own Arab and non Jewish citizens enjoy the same political and legal rights as the majority of their compatriots. Israel’s Arabs have had democracy and the freedom of speech which comes with it long before any other Arab peoples did in this region.

Nevertheless, I still believe strongly that Israel must provide the same services that it offers to its citizens to Palestinians who are living in areas B and C of the West Bank. This means water, transportation, as well as legal protection. This is the duty of every occupying power and we are not fulfilling our duty.

There will be no peace until both peoples are treated equally.

At the same time, Hamas must stop calling for the elimination of Israel and must stop teaching hate. The Palestinians Authority also has its responsibilities. As Greg Roman points out in the often heated debate below, sale of land to Jews is punishable by death by the PA. This is wrong at every level.

The debate below about the new bus line in the West Bank is a good example of the numerous discussions about this topic.

One Response to “Is Israel An Apartheid State?”

  1. Agustina April 4, 2013 at 12:33 pm #

    A worthy ntioonHowever a few misconceptions .. //“MY DEAR MR. PRESIDENT: I have the honor to notify you that the state of Israel has been proclaimed as an independent republic within frontiers approved by the General Assembly of the United Nations in its Resolution of November 29, 1947, and that a provisional government has been charged to assume the rights and duties of government for preserving law and order within the boundaries of Israel, for defending the state against external aggression, and for discharging the obligations of Israel to the other nations of the world in accordance with international law. The Act of Independence will become effective at one minute after six o’clock on the evening of 14 May 1948, Washington time.” // Also This provided the basis on which Israel was given International recognition. Also reflected in the // His Majesty’s Government have also decided to accord de jure recognition to the State of Israel, subject to explanations on two points corresponding to those described above in regard to the case of Jordan. These points are as follows. First, that His Majesty’s Government are unable to recognise the sovereignty of Israel over that part of Jerusalem which she occupies, though, pending a final determination of the status of the area, they recognise that Israel exercises de facto authority in it. Secondly, that His Majesty’s Government cannot regard the present boundaries between Israel, and Egypt, Jordan, Syria and the Lebanon as constituting the definitive frontiers of Israel, as these boundaries were laid down in the Armistice Agreements concluded severally between Israel and each of these States, and are subject to any modifications which may be agreed upon under the terms of those Agreements, or of any final settlements which may replace them.//

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: